Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Money Matters  >  Current Article

Why Do the Big Guys Win?

By   /  August 14, 2017  /  2 Comments

    Print       Email

Click for more information.

A recent Ranching For Profit School graduate sent me a link to MSN Careers.  It had a list of the top 10 “dead-end jobs.” Number one on the list was Farmers and Ranchers. The author concluded that large farms would get bigger and that smaller, independent family farms, that didn’t rely on off-farm income, might soon be a thing of the past.

Why can the big guys make farming and ranching work, whereas the little guys seem to have problems?   When you think about it, the little guy, who seems to be willing to subsidize the farm with off-farm income, should have an advantage over the corporation, whose motive is profit.  For the corporation, the farm must cash flow and yield an annual profit.  The little guy tends to be satisfied if the dollars in equal the dollars out.  So if the little guy is willing to break even and the big guy is demanding a profit, why isn’t the little guy winning?

One obvious reason is scale. The big guys have economies of scale. Their equipment and labor costs are spread over more units. They are also able to buy in bulk to secure discounts and sell truckloads at a time to ensure top dollar.  The big guys get a disproportionate share of farm program subsidies.  The little guy is willing to subsidize himself with cheap labor and off-farm income.  But none of these differences are THE reason the big guys are more profitable. The biggest reason they make more profit is that they demand a profit.

The little guy tends to run the farm or ranch as efficiently as he can, pinching pennies and hoping there will be something left at the end of the year.  The big guy starts with the end in mind, establishing a target for profit, then determines the enterprises required and the strategies needed to achieve the target.

The big guys own a business.  The little guy owns a job.  A little guy willing to build his ranch into a business can make a good profit and he doesn’t always have to be big to do it.  The little guy unwilling to make this transition, well, that just might be a dead-end job.

Save

    Print       Email
  • Published: 1 month ago on August 14, 2017
  • By:
  • Last Modified: August 15, 2017 @ 4:41 pm
  • Filed Under: Money Matters

About the author

Dave Pratt is one of the most sought after speakers and respected authorities on sustainable ranching in North America. He’s earned a reputation for innovative teaching with a practical edge and has helped hundreds of farmers and ranchers develop and implement strategies to improve their land, strengthen their relationships and increase profit. His programs, which include the Ranching For Profit School and Executive Link, have benefited thousands of families and millions of acres. Dave’s new book, Healthy Land Happy Families and Profitable Businesses has received high acclaim from industry leaders. Joel Salatin said, “This book delivers more meaningful advice in one small space than I’ve ever seen.” Wayne Fahsholtz, former President and CEO of Padlock Ranch advised, “If you are serious about wanting your ranch to be successful / sustainable, than this is an important read.” Stan Parsons called it, “…the best book ever written about ranching anywhere.”

2 Comments

  1. Jess Jackson Jr says:

    I had an enlightening discussion with an intern during the summer about 3-4 years ago. I asked her what her earnings goal was when she graduated and started her career in agriculture. Her response was $300K per year. She was an intern and had apparently not connected the apprenticeship with USDA and with her expectations.

    Everyone has to make their own decisions but ranching and farming is too hard to treat as charity for me.

    I would also suggest that the niche ranch and farm can be very profitable. Less iron and more working with creation.

  2. Gene Schriefer says:

    Labor is built in as a cost item, so at least you budget to pay yourself. So is expected/desired return on investment, is a cost.

    This was pointed out at tour of meat plant I Greeley that was for sale many years ago. Corporate managers pegged return on investment at 20% and the plant only could achieve an 18% return, the corporate verdict, this investment was losing us 2% and should be sold.

    Wow what if producers all did this?

You might also like...

Can Wildlife Improve Your Bottom Line?

Read More →