OrganicValley726x88
Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Money Matters  >  Current Article

You Can’t Improve What You Don’t Analyze

By   /  May 4, 2015  /  Comments Off on You Can’t Improve What You Don’t Analyze

Tracking your financial data is probably one of the best ways to find the strengths and weaknesses in your management. Here’s an example of what you can learn and how that might impact what you do on the ground.

    Print       Email

Screenshot 2015-04-28 16.25.17As livestock producers you are constantly reminded of the importance of collecting all kinds of measurements: weaning weight, sale weight, pasture height, days on pasture, pounds per acre….the list goes on and on. All of this data is important, but if you don’t put it into dollars and cents to measure the cost of doing business, then the chance of your farm making a profit is at risk.

I accept that of all the measurements collected, financial data are the least fun to keep. However, after a couple years of keeping financial records and most importantly turning those records into information, I’ve found the pain begins to diminish while the value of this information to your farm grows.

The number one reason for keeping records is to conduct a financial analysis. It helps you identify strengths and weaknesses of your farm. Known as benchmarking, initially you will compare your values to other farms, but after you have several years of your own records, you will benchmark against own operation.

There’s an App For That

One of the tools you can use is a piece of software called FINPACK©. Many states that have trained educators and/or technicians who will help you complete a financial analysis using this software. Let’s take a look at what it can show us, using an example from the University of Minnesota’s Center for Farm Financial Management’s (CFFM) FINBIN© Farm Financial Database. We used farm information from the database, looking at the least profitable 20% and the most profitable 20% of farms.

Low and High profitability farmsHere you can see that there is $254 per cow difference in the gross income between the most and least profitable farms. Each farm received the same price per pound for their calves, yet since the farms in the high 20% sold more weight per cow, receipts were higher ($89/cow). How they accomplished this we’ll see later. The high profit farms also received more for their cull cows. Without knowing the specifics, this may have been because they sold them in better condition or at a higher point in the market. Finally the high profit farms bought fewer cattle (i.e. replacement heifers, cows and/or bulls).

Now let’s check their expenses:

expenses
Finally, looking at cost of production, which is a calculation of break-even cost, the low profit group could probably remain profitable if they did not include their labor costs. The high profit group will remain profitable, even when including labor, until calf prices drop below $113/cwt.The difference between low and high profit farms was $122/cow. Feed cost represented the greatest difference. In the detailed report (not shown here) we learned that the low profit farm supplemented with more protein, fed corn silage and generally fed more hay that was more expensive. The high profit farms paid more for pasture, perhaps because it was of higher quality. This may have meant the cows were in better shape going into the winter and didn’t require extra and expensive feed compared to low profit farms. Other items of note were supplies, which is a catch all for things you might or might not need. The bottom line is that the 20% most profitable farms earned an additional $375/cow compared to the 20% least profitable farms because of their reduced costs.

Cost of productionA complete financial analysis will provide production information – the fun stuff! The most profitable farms had more cows. This is not always the case, but economies of scale cannot be discounted. Both farms settled the same percentage of cows, but the high profit farms lost fewer pregnancies (3.4% vs 1.5%). The high profit farms culled a few more cows, though we don’t know which ones or why. Maybe getting rid of those with problems, likebig teats or low hanging udders, resulted in higher weaning percent. Notice that the high profit farms had a lower weaning weight, but weaned more pounds of calf per cow exposed and ultimately sold more pounds per cow. These two terms are very good indicators of overall reproductive performance.

Instead of a dart board where you hope that you hit the items that reduce profitability, with a financial analysis in hand you know what’s important and increase the likelihood that your efforts will succeed in improving profitability. Sit down with everyone that is part of the farm operation (family, hired labor, veterinarian, Extension educator, feed dealer) and discuss the results of the analysis.

Areas of potential improvement that I would consider:

  1. Income
    1. Calving percent – why is this farm losing 2% pregnancy – herd health?
    2. Weaning percent – why is this farm losing 4% calves from birth to weaning? – mothering instinct; bad udders, scours, pneumonia?
  2. Expense
    1. Nutrition – maintain cows in body condition score of 4-6, depending on age and stage of production.
    2. Feed – how to reduce feed cost: additional time on pasture; keeping cows in better body condition; pasture management; forage testing to better meet nutrient requirements
    3. Mineral program – may be contributing to herd health issues, lack of immunity therefore higher vet and medical expense, pregnancy losses
    4. Overhead – what rusts that you don’t need?
    5. Labor – what can be done more efficiently?
How much cash does your cow make for you?

How much cash does your cow make for you?

Collecting and recording these measurements, at first, can be overwhelming, but when you see the results and your farm moves towards profitability, the drudgery becomes worthwhile.

For more information, contact your local Extension educator.

In New York you can head here, http://beefcattle.ansci.cornell.edu/, or you can contact Mike Baker at mjb28@cornell.edu.

    Print       Email
  • Published: 2 years ago on May 4, 2015
  • By:
  • Last Modified: May 4, 2015 @ 10:41 pm
  • Filed Under: Money Matters
OrganicValley726x88

You might also like...

Grazier Paul Onan with DGA graduate Nate Peplinski. Nate now works full time for Paul.

Dairy Grazing Apprenticeships Are Great for Beginning and Established Farmers

Read More →