As Little as One Week’s Work a Year Can Significantly Improve Riparian Health

Riparian areas are those narrow strips of vegetation that surround creeks, streams, rivers, ponds and lakes. They’re very productive areas, and important wildlife habitat. Healthy riparian areas mean good water quality for everyone downstream too. They’re also easy to damage with bad grazing management. That’s why, in recent years, we’ve seen an uptick in regulations that govern grazing and other agricultural practices that are potentially harmful to riparian corridors and water quality.

Nobody likes regulations, and often, as Troy writes in this week’s Classic by NatGLC, they’re generally put in place for the mediocre manager. The result is reduced flexibility and increased expense for the good manager. So, what do we do?

Perhaps we can learn from the latest research out of California that lays out how easy it can be to get riparian grazing right. Their results of the study are summarized here by Diane Nelson, University of California-Davis College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.

Even Small Efforts to Keep Cows From Creeks Can Significantly Improve Riparian Health

 

With a little time and effort, rangeland managers can have a dramatic impact on the resilience of California’s riparian areas, which are important to the state’s human, environmental and economic well-being. Rangeland ecologists at the University of California, Davis, found that when ranchers invest even one week a year in practices that keep cows away from creeks — like herding, fencing and providing supplemental nutrition and water — they can improve riparian health by as much as 53 percent.

“The human factor is remarkably significant,” said Ken Tate, professor and Cooperative Extension specialist in the UC Davis Department of Plant Sciences. “Common thinking is that effectiveness of various rangeland management tools is site specific and largely due to site factors, such as topography and plant communities. Some practices are better suited to certain ranches for these reasons. But this study suggests that how you implement the tools might be the biggest factor in keeping rangelands productive and environmentally sustainable.”

Tate collaborated with UC farm advisors and several other UC rangeland ecologists on the large-scale riparian conservation study recently reported in the Rangeland Journal. 

One-third of California — 38 million acres — is rangeland. Much of it is mountainous and arid and managed for livestock production. Grazing on rangeland feeds livestock and also offers many environmental benefits like keeping invasive weeds in check, reducing risk and intensity of wildfires, and supporting habitat for certain animals and plants found nowhere else in the world.

Problems arise, though, when cattle spend too much time near water, where manure can create water-quality risks for people downstream. That is especially true in California where some 80 percent of the state’s drinking and irrigation water is stored on or passes through rangeland. Overgrazing in riparian areas also tramples sensitive habitat and lets perfectly good forage on hillsides go to waste.

Examining 1 million acres

Tate and his team studied 46 grazing units on ranches and national forests covering nearly 1 million acres of dry, rugged rangeland in east-central and northeastern California. With the ranchers’ help, they looked at the relationship between number of livestock, managerial effort and riparian health. To measure riparian health, researchers looked for tiny aquatic bugs, animals and insects known as benthic macroinvertebrates.

“We collected the kind of things you’d find under rocks when you crawled around creeks when you were a kid,” Tate explained. “The types of bugs and creepy crawlies present and absent tell us a lot about the biodiversity and health of a stream.”

The team found no significant relationship between riparian health, number of livestock and simple yes/no answers on whether ranchers used fencing, herding or water and salt licks on hillsides to coax cattle from creeks. There was, however, a significant correlation between riparian health and time spent implementing those tools.

“It doesn’t take a lot of effort, but it does take some effort,” Tate said. “When you put a salt lick on a hillside to attract cattle, for example, it’s going to lose its effectiveness if you don’t go back and refill it and move it to another hillside when the grass around it is grazed. Cows cannot live by salt alone.”

Tate is encouraged by the results and the solutions they suggest.

“We see a lot of win-wins,” Tate said. “Effective management opens up new forage opportunities and increases productivity. And when you have more useable land, you relieve pressure on riparian areas, which is good for the environment and for agriculture.”

So, what does this mean for us?

Keeping livestock out of riparian areas works best if they have some reason to leave them. That reason can be as simple as adding a salt lick or mineral block away from them, moving it to a new location when vegetation gets grazed down around it, and making sure that, as the animals eat it, you refill it. If this works in the arid west, where there’s so much more available vegetation in a riparian area than on the drier upland sites, it can surely work elsewhere.

To learn more about how this works, check out this On Pasture article:

Fenceless Targeted Grazing Using Supplement Blocks

Just as important as maintaining the salt lick is maintaining fencing that diverts animals. In large western landscapes, managers sometimes use “drift fences,” partial fences placed across a trail over a mountain pass that can prevent livestock from moving into areas before the manager wants them there.

Herding is probably the most time-intensive tool for moving livestock away from riparian areas. Over time, if animals are repeatedly herded out of areas, they will learn to leave them on their own, but this is an investment in time. You can read more about how this worked for one ranch here:

Training Livestock to Leave Streams and Use Uplands

Researcher Conclusions on Time Required

Off stream nutritional supplements were the easiest on a manager’s time budget, requiring as little as a day or two a year to as much as 8 days. The table below is from their published paper and shows their conclusions.

Want More on Riparian Area Grazing?

We’ve published quite a few articles on this topic in the last eight years. If readers are interested I can put them into an ebook for quick reading and reference. If you vote for that, send me an email. Or if you have other suggestions, let me know. Based on your input, I’ll adjust my schedule to create what you want most.