It’s a problem all over the West: old stands of sagebrush, poor in biodiversity due to lack of disturbance. The increase in sagebrush density over the past century is generally attributed to:
1) reduced numbers of mixed feeders and browsers such as deer, antelope, goats and sheep,
2) increased numbers of cattle and elk,
3) repeatedly grazing the same grasses and forbs, particularly during spring, and
4) fire suppression.
Though the decline in diversity is due in part to grazing, grazing may in fact be the answer to improving plant diversity and wildlife habitat in sagebrush-steppe ecosystems. Researchers at Utah State University have found that grazing by sheep and cattle during the fall, when grasses and forbs are dormant, can increase diversity by reducing sagebrush’s competitive advantage. Supplemental nutrients can improve the effectiveness of fall grazing because sheep and goats supplemented with energy and protein eat nearly twice as much sagebrush as unsupplemented animals. The energy and protein supplements provided enable sheep to better detoxify the toxins found in sagebrush. Thus, intake of sagebrush may be increased if large numbers of supplemented sheep graze sagebrush for a few days in the fall.
We have been investigating methods to increase use of sagebrush by both sheep and cattle. Below are summaries and references for our projects.
Eating Sagebrush to Save It: Creating and Improving Resilience
As managers, we may have unintentionally trained livestock to eat the best and leave the rest by failing to challenge them to increase the number of plant species they eat. Chuck Petersen is trying to change that. As his Masters project, Chuck is teaching cattle that sagebrush can be forage and using them to improve the land. If effective, this approach to habitat renovation will be an alternative to chemicals, mechanical treatments, and fire.
Chuck is conducting his research on Agee Smith’s Cottonwood Ranch near Wells, NV. The study plots are a mix of Wyoming and basin big sagebrush with an understory of grasses and forbs. Each fall as cattle are turned onto the plots, they are supplemented with meadow hay and pellets high in protein and energy to help cattle detoxify terpenes in sagebrush.
Cattle start by getting adapted to sagebrush. When cattle first go onto practice plots, they eat the understory and leave the sagebrush. By the end of the adaptation phase, they are eating sagebrush and are moved to treatment plots. When cattle enter the treatment plots, they mix sagebrush with understory plants. This change in behavior maybe due to experience alone but some studies suggest that rumen microbes may need to adapt to sagebrush in order to use it. While calves tend to gain weight during the feeding trials, smaller framed cows generally maintain their weight or gained, whereas larger framed cattle tend to lose weight. Thus, you need to consider what kind of animals you have and what you should be using if you want to use your cattle to graze and improve sagebrush rangelands.
This Fall grazing is increasing grasses and forbs and changing the age class structure of the sagebrush in the treatment plots. The graphs below show data from Chuck’s plots (grazed and not grazed) that were grazed in 2007 and then sampled in July of 2009 for percent cover, production, and % species composition. As shown below, grazed plots generally contained more grasses and forbs and less sagebrush and other shrubs.
Sheep Grazing Studies
In 2004, graduate students Tyler Staggs and Ryan Woodland, and Dr. Neil West in the Department of Forest, Range and Wildlife Sciences at Utah State University conducted studies to determine if supplementation and high-density, short-duration fall grazing by sheep would increase diversity in plant communities dominated by sagebrush. Their study was conducted at Deseret Land and Livestock in Rich County, UT. Their results indicate fall grazing and supplementation with energy and protein reduced sagebrush abundance and increased biodiversity.
This first study was conducted on small pastures (.62 acres) with permanent fences. For this technique to be effective, producers must be able to use livestock to browse large areas of sagebrush either using herding or temporary electric fence. So in 2006, graduate student Michael Guttery, range extension specialist Roger Banner and professors Fred Provenza and Terry Messmer also from Utah State University conducted a study to determine the feasibility of browsing sagebrush with supplemented sheep on at a larger scale. They grazed eight 8-acre plots with 1,000 mature ewes from mid-October to the end of November on sagebrush dominated rangeland on Utah’s Parker Mountain. A 35-acre demonstration site was also browsed by 1200 yearling ewes from mid-November to mid-December on Blue Mountain near Vernal, UT.
Ewes received a pelleted supplement of 30% corn, 5% soybean meal, 45% alfalfa and 20% beet pulp. On Parker Mountain, ewes were supplemented at a rate of 2 to 3 lbs/hd/day and on Blue Mountain yearling ewes received 1.7 lbs/hd/day. The supplement not only helped sheep consume more sagebrush but was also used to flush them for breeding.
Sagebrush was heavily browsed during the study. The photo above shows the level of heavy browsing most plants received. The objective of this study is to determine if supplementation and high-density, short-duration fall grazing by sheep will increase biodiversity and improve habitat for sage grouse on sagebrush dominated rangeland. The study will also track reproductive performance of ewes and compare costs of grazing treatments with traditional rangeland treatments such as mechanical or chemical methods.
This project was funded by the USDA-NRCS/USU Sage-grouse Restoration Project.
Next week: How one rancher taught his cattle to eat sagebrush to benefit the range and his bottom line!
How could this practice interact with the effort to save sage grouse habitat? Improve? Compete?
Comments are closed.