Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Pasture Health  >  Forage  >  Current Article

Forage Quality on Rangelands is Dropping

By   /  July 31, 2017  /  9 Comments

Declining forage quality is costing ranchers almost $2 billion a year, and there’s no sign of the downward trend changing.

    Print       Email
This article comes to us from Adam Russell, of Texas A&M AgriLife. It was edited for style and l
    Print       Email

About the author

Author and editor emeritus

Rachel's interest in sustainable agriculture and grazing has deep roots in the soil. She's been following that passion around the world, working on an ancient Nabatean farm in the Negev, and with farmers in West Africa's Niger. After returning to the US, Rachel received her M.S. and Ph.D. in agronomy and soil science from the University of Maryland. For her doctoral research, Rachel spent 3 years working with Maryland dairy farmers using management intensive grazing. She then began her work with grass farmers, a source of joy and a journey of discovery.

9 Comments

  1. Jim Gerrish says:

    I’m a little late coming to the conversation, but I have to agree with some of the other comments that the decline is more likely due to lack of effective grazing management rather than climate change. No, I am not a climate change denier. I have read some of the research regarding elevated CO2 levels resulting in lower protein %. It is real, but the degree of change is what I would call an academic butterfly. It is statistically significant, it is publishable, and a researcher can build a career around such research. In the greater scheme of landscape scale range condition, I think the effect of poor grazing practices on plant community is the overriding cause of the decline in protein availability on the range.

  2. Troy Reinke says:

    Why was there no definitive statement on the suspected causes of this nutrient decline. This study would bear more weight if they had also included research that listed range trends from these sample areas. This nutrient decline is more like a product of overgrazing. Continuous overgrazing of native rangelands removes the palatable, nutrient dense decreaser species from the range sites. This leads to the increaser and invasive species increasing. The average trend on most range sites has been negative, reverting to a state of woody dominated sites with cool season and early successional warm season plants as the predominant forage species. These poorer quality grasses then become the primary forage base by default. Poor condition native rangelands are going to produce a poor quality of forage. It would stand to reason that poor grazing management leads to poor range condition leads to poor nutrient availability leads to poor performing livestock and the need to provide expensive protein supplements.

    • Kathy Voth says:

      Actually there were three causes suggested for the decline – over-grazing, climate change and drought. Also, I’ve been trying to get ahold of the primary researcher so I can provide some additional information like this. So stay tuned!

  3. Jess Jackson Jr says:

    My initial reaction was that this is a grazing management problem rather than climate.

    Poor management overgrazes leguminous species removing this high protein component from the diet.

    I am convinced that mimicking creation where predators keep the herds moving yields better soil-forage-and livestock quality ass each build up from the improved management.

    Also occurs to me that the opposite could be true. Short grazing periods with more mature forage could yield the same research result and cows in the first and second trimester are okay. Last trimester and growing animals need better quality forage. Hmmmmmm.

    • Kathy Voth says:

      As I understand it, Jess, the nutritional quality of C3 grasses is impacted by elevated atmospheric CO2. According to one paper I read, a significant increase in sugars, starch and fructan in the C3 grasses under elevated CO2 was associated with a significant reduction in their protein levels. So it’s a function of the grasses and their reaction to increasing CO2 in our atmosphere that may be contributing to lower forage quality overall. I’ll look for more information on this to share with On Pasture readers.

      • Gary Jones says:

        CO2 is a limiting nutrient, especially for C3 plants that evolved for a higher CO2 concentration. Green houses pump in additional CO2 to mitigate this lack.

        However, easing one limiting nutrient exposes the next limit. Perhaps it’s water, though higher CO2 also reduces water use in C3, or perhaps it’s nitrogen, though N levels in the environment have also increased due to biomass and fossil fuel burning. Other nutrients also matter and can be limiting. No land has a perfect balance of nutrients naturally, and each place is different.

        The total amount of protein has increased, but not as much as energy (carbohydrate and lipids) so the percentages of each nutrient can, perhaps misleadingly, be spun to find a doom scenario. It’s standard practice for researchers to find some gloomy factor to cite, and link to climate, to signal that they are cooperating with the agenda and deserve increased funding. More research is needed; send money, guns and lawyers.

        Graziers can sensibly respond to changing circumstances with grazing management, supplementation, and eventually improved agronomic practice. Switching the mind set from cowboy to grass farmer helps. Rather than just extracting resources from the range, they might find a management model that is more beneficial. They might improve range rather than just hoping to extract a steady amount year after year.

  4. Gene Schriefer says:

    All 36,000 samples showed decline? None were improving?

    Seems like more of grazing management issue to me and N may not be the answer. Added N may burn through the existing organic matter faster.

  5. Scott Brady says:

    An interesting article, but I wonder if the sudden uptick in sampling due to the CSP Program rollout in 2010 affected the results. Is it possible that the decline in forage quality was due to a sudden influx of samples from arid areas that typically have lower quality forage, but where little or no sampling was done prior to 2010? It will be interesting to see where the next 5-10 years takes us.

  6. Chip Hines says:

    Research from Texas A&M is showing improvements in soils with rest/rotation grazing management. Promoting this type management will become more important in solving the problem at the soil level instead of spending money to adjust what the cow eats.

You might also like...

What’s the Impact of Grazing Without Recovery Periods?

Read More →
Translate »